![Microsoft to do vs asana](https://knopkazmeya.com/1.png)
For example, users can choose between Scrum and Kanban as their preferred methodology. With Project 2016, Microsoft embraced (if only partially) the Agile methodology with Agile-specific capabilities in the newest Project version.
MICROSOFT TO DO VS ASANA SOFTWARE
Project has always favored a Waterfall approach, which isn't ideal for most software projects. MS project was not created with software development in mind. While JIRA has expanded into new industries, Microsoft Project is creeping into software development. It's also easy to keep tabs on team members' progress and workloads. Projects can be managed and monitored simultaneously in JIRA. We found that JIRA shines for workflow scenarios within large organizations - ones that require project- and task-oriented operations to be completed often. With the shift from industry-specific to general, JIRA started to drift across market segments. Some of those include Big Picture and Tempo Timesheets. The Marketplace allowed third-party developers to create plugins for JIRA that fit more general PM needs. In 2012, however, JIRA's popularity as a generic PM tool increased with the launch of Atlassian Marketplace. In fact, it's still billeted as a software development software. JIRA was originally designed as an issue-tracking tool for software developers. We put these two products in a head-to-head battle, and we tested features and capabilities that were similar to one another to accomplish a list of set tasks. And yes, we declared a winner in this showdown.
![microsoft to do vs asana microsoft to do vs asana](https://images.saasworthy.com/asana_1605_screenshot_1590495608_iwct6.png)
Here's what we discovered during the course of our arduous investigation. We stacked it against JIRA and Asana, two popular PM tools. Seriously, it's hard to believe after 30 years, it's still going strong. Earlier this week, we pondered Microsoft Project's viability.
![Microsoft to do vs asana](https://knopkazmeya.com/1.png)